Bohemian Rhapsody review – If you are here purely for the music you certainly wonโ€™t be disappointed

ON Saturday July 13, 1985, a day forever etched in the memory of music fans of a certain vintage, one bandโ€™s star shone brightest of all.

Queen stole the show at Live Aid, a global charity rock concert to raise funds for famine relief in Ethiopia, with an exalted performance. Not Bowie, not U2, not even Paul McCartney could touch Queenโ€™s majesty that day, in what is often deemed โ€œone of the greatest performances in the history of rock musicโ€.

So, it is apt that their Live Aid performance is the jump on and jump off point of Bryan Singerโ€™s foot-stomping celebration of Queen, their music and their extraordinary lead singer Freddie Mercury.

Continue reading below . . .ย 

Advertisement

If you are here purely for the music you certainly wonโ€™t be disappointed.

As biopics go, โ€˜Bohemian Rhapsodyโ€™ is joyously entertaining and at its very best when focusing on the band and their music. Rami Malek gives a brilliant performance as the flamboyant Queen frontman but unfortunately the film barely scratches the surface of Freddieโ€™s own personal life, which, surely, would have made for more powerful viewing. Instead, Singer opts to skim over Mercuryโ€™s relationship with common-law wife Mary Austin, his brave battle with Aids and the early life in Zanzibar of one Farrokh Bulsara.

โ€˜Bohemian Rhapsodyโ€™ is disjointed, somewhat sanitised, and tells us nothing we didnโ€™t already know. It is a real shame they opted to play it so safe.

Malek saves the film from being a royal flop but it is Queenโ€™s music that permits us to overlook many of its foibles. A real missed opportunity.