Review- Mary Poppins

MARY Poppins Returns is a pleasant family movie. I wanted to love it, but it proved disappointing.

It was diverting, agreeable, nice even. Worth a watch, sure, but it felt little more than a rehash. If Iโ€™m honest, it lacked sparkle, imagination and spontaneity.

It also left me with a strange sense of dรฉjร  vu.

If nostalgia is what you are after, you have come to the right place, as it is laid on thick and heavy.

Advertisement

However, โ€˜Mary Poppins Returnsโ€™ is bereft of the charm and magic that gushed from the original movie. A spoonful of sugar does not help this medicine go down.

Imitation may be a form of flattery. But Oasis was not The Beatles. Lady Gaga not fit to stand in David Bowieโ€™s mighty shadow. And Emily Blunt, as talented as she may be, is no Julie Andrews.

Actually, Blunt is outperformed from the off here by Broadway star Lin-Manuel Miranda as Jack the lamplighter. Even the songs are no match to those from the 1964 musical, with the wonderful exceptions of โ€˜Underneath a Lovely London Skyโ€™ and โ€˜The Place Where Lost Things Goโ€™.

The whole thing is just too safe, too uninspired and brings nothing new to this much-loved nannyโ€™s fantastical tale to warrant a sequel. The most heart-warming scene, in a purely devious moment of Disney sentimentality, comes in the shape of a special cameo appearance from Dick Van Dyke, which brings a tear to the eye.

Overall, this is a pleasant but rather forgettable return for Mary Poppins.

A nice tribute to the original but little else.