Council defers sale of city property to Tait House

The property on Cecil Street which was at the centre of a debate at Monday's council meeting. Photo: Cian Reinhardt

CONFUSION reigned at County Hall when councillors came to an impasse over a decision to sell council-owned property in the city centre to Tait House Community Enterprise.

At Mondayโ€™s meeting of Limerick City and County Council, concerns were once again raised over the sale of 36 Cecil Street to the community development co-operative forย โ‚ฌ90,000.

Fine Gael councillor Sarah Kiely called for the matter to be deferred to the next meeting of the Metropolitan District. She told council members that there is โ€œpublic money at stake hereโ€.

She also called for the disposal of property at Galvone Industrial Estate to Tait House to be deferred.

Advertisement

Former Mayor James Collins (FF) was keen for the disposal of both sites to be formalised and said there is a need for cultural space in the city centre.

The Gaff โ€” a resource for theatre and performing arts in Limerick, currently occupies 36 Cecil Street.

Kieran Oโ€™Hanlon (FF) also felt the sale of the city site to the Southill-based organisation would bring life into the city centre.

โ€œIt is a very worthwhile project,โ€ he added.

Independent councillor Emmett Oโ€™Brien said he gets โ€œjitteryโ€ when he hears talk of โ€œcultural activismโ€ in a political arena.

โ€œThis is public money. I would prefer if we didnโ€™t get involved in cultural activism. This is deeply shambolic,โ€ Cllr Oโ€™Brien insisted.

Fine Gael councillor John Sheahan said it made no sense for the council to be selling the Cecil Street site. He also wanted to know why the local authority couldnโ€™t retain the building and themselves become the landlords.

โ€œWe need more flesh on the bones,โ€ he told the council executive.

Green Party councillor Brian Leddin raised concerns that local representatives were told make a FOI (Freedom of Information) request when they asked for more information.

Sinn Fรฉin councillor John Costelloe took the view that there was a โ€œserious lack of transparencyโ€ around the proposed sale.

โ€œWe need to know how taxpayers money is being spent. We canโ€™t have it willy-nilly.โ€

Labour Party councillor Joe Leddin also felt there was an โ€œelement of confusionโ€ surrounding the matter.

Council Head of Design and Delivery Joe Delaney assured council members that the process was completed in a โ€œtransparentโ€ and โ€œrobustโ€ fashion.

Councillors finally agreed to defer the item until next monthโ€™s full meeting of the Council.

Advertisement