Garda chief to consider the effects of unlawful Limerick arrest case

Garda Commissioner Drew Harris will meet with the Policing Authority in Limerick this week.

THE Garda Commissioner is to consider the effects of a ruling by a Circuit Court Judge who found that a man was unlawfully arrested at a checkpoint in County Limerick because the arresting Garda told him he was being held to confirm if he was who he said he was.

In the first stage of a two-part ruling at Limerick Circuit Civil Court on Tuesday, Judge Francis Comerford said he was satisfied that Anthony O’Donoghue (36) of St Micheal’s Park, Gort Road, Ennis was unlawfully arrested.

Mr O’Donoghue is suing the Garda Commissioner, the Minister for Justice and the Attorney General for  false imprisonment, damages, aggravated damages due to alleged assault and battery by the application of handcuffs by Gardaí, trespass to the person, as well as an alleged breach of his constitutional right to bodily integrity.

Judge Comerford, who is to finalise his ruling regarding damages in the case, said: “Gardai cannot arrest people they don’t like the look of. There has to be something more.”

Cian Kelly BL, acting for the Garda Commissioner and the other defendants, replied: “I would imagine this will be something that will need to be considered by my clients. It’s an area of the law I know the Commissioner will take an interest in, as well as the depth of analysis this court has taken”.

Sign up for the weekly Limerick Post newsletter

The judge said Mr O’Donoghue was arrested after the car he was driving was stopped at a Garda checkpoint outside Rathkeale on December 13, 2015.

The arresting officer, Garda Dermot Hallet of the Limerick Traffic Corps said he asked Mr O’Donoghue for his name, date of birth, address and driving licence.

Mr O’Donoghue provided his true name, date of birth, and address, but did not have his driver’s licence.

When Garda Hallet asked who the registered owner of the car was, Mr O’Donoghue asked why he wanted to know this.

Judge Comerford ruled this was “not a refusal to give information” and did not constitute an arrest.

Garda Hallett said he informed Mr O’Donoghue he was going to arrest him “to establish who you are”.

Judge Comerford said that while Mr O’Donoghue’s “demeanour” had involved “mumbled” responses, this, was “not enough” for a Garda to invoke a power of arrest, under the legislation.

“On its own, this could lead to arrests on instinct. Demeanour and absence of a driver’s licence are not enough. The arresting Garda did not apply the correct arrest test,” said the judge.

Judge Comerford said “there was no mala fide on the part of the arresting Garda”, meaning that he believed Gardaí had acted in good faith throughout their interaction with the plaintiff.

He said Garda Hallett, assisted by a Garda colleague, had put Mr O’Donoghue in handcuffs after he allegedly “clenched his fists, and stepped forward” and that “the arresting Garda said he was under pressure, and he feared he would be head-butted”.

Judge Comerford said he rejected Mr O’Donoghue’s evidence that Garda Hallett put him in handcuffs without informing him why he was arresting him.

Mr O’Donoghue claimed he suffered a fractured right wrist as well as nerve damage to his wrist from the handcuffs being closed too tightly around his wrists.

Gardaí gave evidence that while they were transporting Mr O’Donoghue in a patrol car from the checkpoint to Newcastle West Garda Station, they stopped twice along the route to try to remove the handcuffs after the plaintiff complaining.

The first occasion was unsuccessful but they eventually removed the handcuffs when they “put Mr O’Donoghue face down on the bonnet” of the patrol car.

Mr O’Donoghue claimed the handcuffs were not removed from his wrists until they reached the Garda station.

At the station Gardai established that the name and date of birth given to them by the plaintiff were correct, but they did not accept the address he had provided was where he was living. They claimed he was living at a halting site in Ennis and had several other addresses.

Mr O’Donoghue was brought to a locum doctor who could not immediately determine any serious injury to his wrist. He was  given painkillers and released without charge.

On January 7 a plaster cast was applied to his right wrist for a suspected possible fracture, a type that was “notoriously difficult to diagnose immediately after such an injury”.

Mr O’Donoghue complained of suffering pain in his right wrist for a further 18 months. The court was not been presented with any evidence that he received any further medical treatment in that period of time.

Judge Comerford said he would give a full judgement on the claimed damages on April 22.

Advertisement