Ten enterprises sold since 1991
A PUBLIC POLICY expert from the University of Limerick has recommended that the government maintain control of critical state assets in the future.
โIn a very difficult fiscal situation like ours. Privatisation of state assets is often seen as a means of raising cash. We believe itโs probably the worst thing to sell off critical infrastructure; we need these assets to ensure that weโre competitive in the future.
โSelling these companies we lose control of critical state assets that we should retain control ofโ.
Their findings are in contrast to those of a recent report by Dr Colm McCarthy on the sale of state assets.
โThis report suggests that we should sell our stake in Aer Lingus… we would disagree with this as we would lose control of our connectivity.
โThe McCarthy report looks forward and we are trying to learn from past privatisation experiences. We believe that there are more lessons to be learnedโ.
Dr Reeves is director of Privatisation & Public Private Partnerships Research Group at UL, and carried out the first in-depth study into state-owned enterprises that were sold in Ireland, with his colleague Dr Donal Palcic.
โIf we sell the remaining state assets, there is an assumption that their performance will improve, resulting in better value for the consumer. there is no evidence of that to date.
โIt is more likely to get better performance by opening up to competitionโ.
Since 1991, when privatisation began in Ireland, 10 state-owned enterprises have been sold, earning โฌ8.6 billion for the exchequer.
This removed state control in strategic sectors such as shipping, air transport, sugar and steel.
โAs economists focus on enterprise performance, we performed an in-depth analysis of the state assets that were sold.
โBasic performance indicators suggest that just one company has performed successfully. Most of them performed well before privatisation, but not necessarily afterโ.
The UL economists also measured up the costs including selling shares at a discounts to employees in the Employees Share Ownership Plan (ESOP) scheme and paying fees to the relevant professionals during the privatisation process.
โWe calculated that revenues foregone as a result of privatisation amounted to โฌ2.2 billion, with โฌ1.1 billion from ESOPsโ.
Dr Reeves said that large scale ESOPs are a unique feature of Irish privatisation. Itโs a reflection of social partnership in Ireland.
โPrivate Equity Groups involving Dermot Desmond and George Soros, also did very well from the sale of Eircom. It had a negative affect on the economy, as they allocated huge dividends and a huge deficit in broadband infrastructure, that is a disaster for a small export orientated countryโ.
The lecturer said that Ireland has to get its privatisation policy right.
โThere is an obvious case for selling shares in state assets while maintaining majority control, performance is then monitored by private investors.
โTraditionally in Europe, government has always maintained a controlling interestโ